[identity profile] x-tarot.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] xp_communication
To: [Summers, Scott]
From: [Colbert, Marie-Ange]
Subject: An explanation.
Attached: Fwd: Subject: She played me.


... Perhaps I should be more direct.

I do not trust that Manuel de la Rocha is not going to come in here and scream down my room, or use his powers to attack Amanda. He has attacked people before, myself and Douglas included. He left what I must assume are veiled threats in an email recently, and I should have forwarded that to the staff because he signed it Empath and not Manuel and referenced Loki's teachings.

That email is now forwarded to you. Please forward it to anyone else who may need it. I do not trust Manuel, with good reason.

.....

Date: 2005-10-13 03:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-cyclops.livejournal.com
And you could not have come to me directly with this?

I cannot believe you. I really can't. You chose to challenge the staff, and, incidentally, insult the rest of the student body, rather than express to me or Charles or Ororo that you had a specific concern. Where is the logic in that?

As for the matter at hand, rest assured that Manuel will not be acting aggressively towards Amanda.

Cyclops

Subject: to be perfectly honest...

Date: 2005-10-13 04:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-cyclops.livejournal.com
I am not seeing any kind of explicit threat in this email. I am seeing what could be interpreted as a potential threat if you chose to interpret it as such, and if I have to go drag Manuel by the ear in to see the Professor so that Charles can make the way things will be clear, I will. Although I suspect Charles will not need my help on that score; if nothing else, something will almost certainly have to be done with their link before Amanda leaves.

What I don't understand, Angie, is why the possibility of a threat to Amanda has you on the warpath, and yet you don't seem to be acknowledging what she did. Needless to say, we are not going to allow another student to endanger her, even if she willfully and without regret endangered other students, the doctors, and a patient.

She doesn't believe she did anything wrong. She didn't act out of panic. She had a position of trust and she threw it away without a second thought. One of the babies could have been in the medlab - Rachel was supposed to be - and Nathan tells me that Amanda didn't stop to think about that possibility.

How much bigger than Frank is a two-month-old baby?

Scott

Subject: ...

Date: 2005-10-13 04:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-cyclops.livejournal.com
Why is it that all you can see in this situation is Manuel? Or is it all that you choose to see?

He is a side issue. He will be dealt with. You dragging up incidents over a year old is not doing anything but making it look like you're trying to deflect attention away from what Amanda did. I got more than enough of that from her this morning when I spoke to her.

Nothing you're saying makes me think that you trust us. Maybe you have cause, but maybe I thought that progress had been made over the last year, all around.

Scott

Subject: then I'm going to trust you...

Date: 2005-10-13 04:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-cyclops.livejournal.com
To tell us anything that needs to be told, and go away from the computer now. It's not as if there aren't a large number of things that need to be done.

I can handle all of this, Angie, if I know I have my team behind me. If you were just a student, I wouldn't have been arguing with you. You're not. You're more than that, and I expect more from you. I expect you to be able to look to the greater good, or the greater threat, and stand behind the people who are trying to do that as well.

Scott

Profile

xp_communication: (Default)
X-Project Communications

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516171819 20
21 222324252627
28293031   

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 23rd, 2026 01:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios