email to Doug
May. 2nd, 2005 06:45 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
To: [hacker #2]
From: [hacker #1]
Subject: Did you see the 'article' about the attack this morning?
Am I the only one a tad incensed that the best the paper could manage about Jay getting beaten into the medlab (and, ok, mad healing factor and all, how bad does it have to have been to land him in the medlab for a whole night?) was a two paragraph blurb three days later about an "incident" buried on page four next to the movie listings and not even any mention of police inqueries? And do they mean the police aren't making inqueries or that they're not talking about them?
I feel that this deserves independant investigations. What say you?
-Kit
From: [hacker #1]
Subject: Did you see the 'article' about the attack this morning?
Am I the only one a tad incensed that the best the paper could manage about Jay getting beaten into the medlab (and, ok, mad healing factor and all, how bad does it have to have been to land him in the medlab for a whole night?) was a two paragraph blurb three days later about an "incident" buried on page four next to the movie listings and not even any mention of police inqueries? And do they mean the police aren't making inqueries or that they're not talking about them?
I feel that this deserves independant investigations. What say you?
-Kit
no subject
Date: 2005-05-03 12:46 am (UTC)From: [hacker #1a]
Subject: Grr...
Incensed doesn't even begin to cover it, Kit. Anyone want to guess why?
That is to say, yes, I am absolutely up for independent investigating.
-Doug
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 11:27 am (UTC)From: [because I was here first]
Subject: Indeed
Yeah, three guesses and the first two don't count.
You want to start with seeing if the paper knows anymore they're not saying or go straight for seeing what the police are looking at?
-Kit