(no subject)

[x-copycat.livejournal.com]

To: [Forge]
From: [Lennox, Morgan]
Subject: Point 2a

Do you fail to recall what a "need to know" basis is? How about the term "clearance" and the phrase "potential security risk"? While you may have failed to recall that my profession was neither a public or widespread fact, surely I'd think that brain of yours could recollect being told that information was on a need to know basis only and you, therefore, were only told as the security person at the mansion. Previously I could count the number of people who had been informed of my profession on one hand. Now anyone who chooses to read that journal entry of Adrienne's knows. You are an idiot.

Comments

[x-forge.livejournal.com]

To: [Lennox, Morgan]
From: [Forge]
Subject: A few corrections

Point one - I am aware of need-to-know. As a guest here, you don't decide who needs to know what.

Point two - If you think your former profession needs to be kept a secret, the problem lies with you, not me.

Point three - If it's no longer a former profession, then we have a problem.

Point four - Actually, I'm a genius. I can see where there might be a confusion to those of merely average intellect, but I can assure you that I'm not an idiot.

I'm a big proponent of full disclosure. It's worked quite well for Dayspring, for example. He's been quite a good role model in showing people that despite coming from a background of violence, that you can make something of your life.

Perhaps it's time you became an object lesson and did something constructive for a change.

You can thank me later.

JHF

[x-copycat.livejournal.com]

To: [Forge]
From: [Lennox, Morgan]
Subject: Your corrections need correcting

Point one: As someone who came here for help with her powers I have the right to keep whatever parts of my life private that I choose to. You do not have authority to choose full disclosure on my behalf just because you're in charge of security, sweet pea.

Point Two: The point in keeping it confidential was not to worry anyone or potentially attract attention that didn't need to be attracted in order to continue to keep people safe. A person choosing to keep certain things to themselves isn't a problem, it's a choice. Learn the difference.

Point Three: It was never a former profession and you don't outrank the person who said it wasn't a problem.

Point Four: I'm sorry, allow me to rephrase: You're a twat.

You come off as ignorant of mercenary work so somehow I'm not that bothered by your opinions of it. However, I gave full disclosure to the person that I needed to give it to. I requested it not be broadcast to everyone as a whole for a variety of reasons, none of which I need to explain to you. That person trusted you, as his head of security, with the information which you were told was not to be public knowledge. You violated that trust he put in you which in turn violates the trust I put in him when I came here for help.

Maybe it's time you stop assuming you know everything and bring the arrogance down a few notches. You've had no problems with me since I've gotten here and now suddenly you decide I'm the villain? Grow the fuck up.