Email to Dayspring, Nathan
May. 12th, 2004 11:27 amFrom: de la Rocha, Manuel
To: Dayspring, Nathan
Subject: Ethics
So what, precisely, is wrong with my ethics? They're supple enough to deal with changing realities, and ... well, that's all that really counts.
They're quite supple. I am growing adept at adapting them to changing circumstances. This is how things _should_ be.
Manuel
To: Dayspring, Nathan
Subject: Ethics
So what, precisely, is wrong with my ethics? They're supple enough to deal with changing realities, and ... well, that's all that really counts.
They're quite supple. I am growing adept at adapting them to changing circumstances. This is how things _should_ be.
Manuel
I do reject it
Date: 2004-05-12 01:22 pm (UTC)Why do other people's rights to think malicious thoughts or want to do me harm not end at my brain?
Your little analogy works fine for humans, but for those of us with gifts, it breaks down.
Manuel
here's a thought...
Date: 2004-05-12 01:30 pm (UTC)You're a psi, you're not a child.
Nathan
Oh, I get it now.
Date: 2004-05-12 01:32 pm (UTC)My right to swing my fist, as you say, ends at other people's metaphoric noses. But their right to swing their fist stops - nowhere?
Is that it?
And what, precisely, did I do that was so bad that I have earned your venom?
Manuel
well, let's see...
Date: 2004-05-12 01:44 pm (UTC)As for venom... if you'd ask me this last week, I could have given you a list. I suspect it would have started with Angie's name. Lately, though, I find my perspective has been altered. Too much Askani philosophy, maybe. They have their own opinions, I'm finding, and they can't help but sway mine.
So, what do I feel. Fear, still - old habits die hard. But I also feel... pity, also a certain resolution. If you don't learn, you're not going to make it.
Nathan
No.
Date: 2004-05-12 01:47 pm (UTC)So you let the Askani, whoever they are, define you now? How very interesting. Have I been talking to you, or to them?
Is there even a difference anymore, if they've altered you so profoundly?
Maybe it is _YOU_ who needs the dampener around one wrist, Nathan, not I.
Manuel
you can't have it both ways...
Date: 2004-05-12 01:52 pm (UTC)And you've been talking to all of us, Manuel. Interesting: I don't think anyone else has twigged to that yet. But in all the things I've thought about you, I've never thought you weren't perceptive.
As for me wearing a dampener... a weak parry, Manuel. Very weak.
Nathan
Sure I can
Date: 2004-05-12 01:54 pm (UTC)Well, it seems that your ability to keep people who aren't even alive yet from punching your nose is an order of magnitude worse than my problem with keeping my time-contemporaries from doing it, isn't it?
Manuel
they're not punching my nose...
Date: 2004-05-12 01:56 pm (UTC)It's really kind of nifty. Care to take this offline? You could always come meet them.
Nathan
Pass, thanks.
Date: 2004-05-12 01:57 pm (UTC)I'm trying to be me. I don't want to be them any more than I want to be you.
And there's scant difference between those two - just your perspective. Take it from someone who knows.
Manuel
your loss...
Date: 2004-05-12 01:58 pm (UTC)Nathan
For you, perhaps.
Date: 2004-05-12 01:59 pm (UTC)Manuel