[identity profile] x-tarot.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] xp_communication
To: (La petite chat)
CC: (Knight of Cups), (Jamiejamiejamie)
From: (High Priestess)
Subject: That stock market expirement



I find myself with some free time on my hands, and since we are back from Minnesota, I am willing to start this whenever you are, Kitty.

Who else, besides Doug and Jamie, do we want to recruit for a control group? (That is the correct term, yes?)

Date: 2004-04-05 07:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-crowdofone.livejournal.com
To: {Imax Lass}
CC: {Chewbacca}, {Gorgeous One}
Subject: What stock market experiment?

Did I miss a memo?

Reply to all

Date: 2004-04-05 07:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-crowdofone.livejournal.com
That sounds fun. Count me in. I even swear not to intentionally pick funny stocks.

And all e-mail nicknames are silly, it's a rule.

Yet More Replying to All.

Date: 2004-04-05 07:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-crowdofone.livejournal.com
I've always thought pork belly futures were pretty amusing. And you never know what'll happen with those three-letter abbreviations.

It is indeed an important difference. Both are fun though.

Reply to All Again

Date: 2004-04-05 08:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-crowdofone.livejournal.com
I don't know exactly. I think it has to do with trying to predict how well pork bellies will do next year and investing based on that. Mostly it just sounds funny.

Reply to all

Date: 2004-04-05 07:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-kitten.livejournal.com
Nope. I'm picking the stocks, and I'm doing it randomly. Everybody gets the same set of twenty.

-K

(Sorry, forgot to mention to you, Jamie. Or rather, I meant to and then you were all distracting at me and I forgot.)

Reply to all

Date: 2004-04-05 07:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-crowdofone.livejournal.com
So the difference is we decide individually how much to buy and when to sell and stuff?

(No harm done, I know now, and I got to be all distracting at you earlier. Well enough to make you forget stuff, even. :))

Reply to all as always

Date: 2004-04-05 07:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-kitten.livejournal.com
Well, I think we were thinking of starting more simply. Just predicting whether or not they will go up or down, and by how much.

Hmm...

Yeah, I guess we never said anything more than that in our original outline. Not sure how I'd set it up if we were doing 'buying and selling'.

Reply to all again

Date: 2004-04-05 07:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-crowdofone.livejournal.com
Oh, that makes more sense. This is why you design the science experiments and I provide the snacks, love. :) So when do we start?

Reply to all again

Date: 2004-04-05 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-kitten.livejournal.com
*laugh*

We start sometime after we get a few more controls. M-A, you want to ask people, since it's your power we're testing? We probably ought to get at least five controls total, (so at least three more), but I could handle up to ten, I'm sure, especially if you're still worried about how Doug's power will affect things.

-K

Reply to all again-again-again

Date: 2004-04-05 09:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-kitten.livejournal.com
*nod* yeah, and try and get one who doesn't know about stocks.

Hmm. You have a point, but if his data is too abarrant I'll just throw it out. Maybe ask one other person just in case.

-K

Re: Reply to all again-x4

Date: 2004-04-05 09:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-crowdofone.livejournal.com
Trials of dating geeks, right, Angie? :)

'Course, I'm the one who started taking physics for the cute girl in the class and ended up learning how to play with so-advanced-it-can't-see-the-edge holographic technology for fun, so maybe I'm not one to talk.

Re: Reply to all again-x4

Date: 2004-04-05 10:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-crowdofone.livejournal.com
Will do. But he's going under there all by himself. I'm not risking any extremely-well-read dust bunnies with laser guns.

Re: Reply to all again-x4

Date: 2004-04-05 10:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-kitten.livejournal.com
Well, Mr. Dayspring's out, cause he's a 'path. But we could see if Bobby or John or maybe Marie would be willing to be our staff observer. And I guess if they know a little about stocks it would be ok, but not a lot. Er, that might let Mr. Wisdom into it, or maybe Mr. Summers and Ms. Munroe. Oh, and probably Kurt and Sam would qualify, cause I doubt Kurt would know much about US stocks, at least.

And, actually, we might not have to have them actually taking part in the experiment. It might be enough if they were just observing/monitoring to make sure we didn't do something stupid (not sure how we could do something stupid predicting stocks though...) So then you could ask Al or Ms. Frost or really anyone. We're going to want to talk to Ms. Frost eventually anyways.

-K

Profile

xp_communication: (Default)
X-Project Communications

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
1516 17 18192021
22 23242526 2728
29 30     

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 05:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios